Posts Tagged Exasol
Why should you bother? Because Exasol is the fastest analytical database in the world, outperforming any competitor. Therefore, expertise about Exasol might soon be very valuable also in your company.
Free training helps us to spread the knowledge in a scalable way, empowering customers across the globe to get the best out of Exasol and supporting our rapid growth.
You can register here. The free online courses are branded as “Exacademy”:
The Database Administration course there is my baby 🙂 You will create your own virtualized Exasol Cluster on your local machines if you go through it. I know having your personal sandbox can be very instructive because that’s what I was using myself to better understand Exasol clusters before developing that course.
When I create course material, I always ask myself: What would I want to get from this course if I attended it? And that’s what I try to put in: To the point, no nonsense, just stuff that works and helps to understand. Hope you find it useful 🙂
An Exasol database will automatically create, maintain and drop indexes, following the core idea to deliver great performance without requiring much administrative efforts. Like our tables, our indexes are always compressed and you don’t need to configure anything for that.
Joins between two or more tables are processed like this in Exasol: One table is full scanned (this is called the root table) and the other tables are joined using an index on their join columns.
If these indexes on the join columns are not already existing, they are automatically created during the join operation. Taking two tables t1 and t2 as an example, and a statement like
select count(*) from t1 join t2 on t1.joincol = t2.joincol;
The Exasol optimizer will compute an execution plan based on automatically gathered statistics that inform it amongst others about the table sizes. Often, the smaller table will become the root table and the other table will be joined using an index on the join column.
Let’s see an example:
create or replace table t1 as select rownum as joincol, 'Just some text' as textcol, mod(rownum,5) as numcol1, mod(rownum,1000) as numcol2, 5000 as numcol3, to_date ('01.' || lpad(to_char(mod(rownum,12)+1),2,'0') || '.2018' ,'dd.mm.yyyy') as time_id from (select 1 from dual connect by level<=1e6); SUCCESS CREATE 36.43 1000000 OK create or replace table t2 as select * from t1 limit 5e5; SUCCESS CREATE 0.735 500000 OK select count(*) from t1 join t2 on t1.joincol=t2.joincol; COUNT(*) 500000 select index_table,remarks from exa_dba_indices where index_table like 'T_'; INDEX_TABLE REMARKS T1 GLOBAL INDEX (JOINCOL)
That index got created during query execution (on the first join between t1 and t2) and subsequently supports further joins with t1 on joincol.
If DML is done on t1, this index is maintained by the system:
INSERT into t1 will add new index entries accordingly.
DELETE from t1 will mark rows as deleted until more than 25% of rows have been deleted, Then t1 is reorganized automatically and the index is automatically rebuilt.
UPDATE statements that affect less than 15% of rows will update index key entries accordingly. If more than 15% of rows are updated, the index is automatically rebuilt.
If an index is not used to support queries for more than 5 weeks, it will be automatically dropped. That way, a useless index will not slow down DML and consume space for no good reason.
Operationally, nothing needs to be done about indexes in Exasol and that’s what most of our customers do: They just let the system take care of indexes. In earlier versions, EXA_DBA_INDICES didn’t exist even to avoid providing superfluous information.
What is a global index and why was it created that way on t1, you may ask. Like tables, indexes are also distributed across the Exasol cluster nodes. If the index part on a node points only to table rows residing on the same node, that’s a local index. A global index means that the index part on a node points to (at least some) table rows residing on another node. Means a global join leads to global indexes while local joins lead to local indexes. Profiling a join between t1 and t2 confirms that:
select part_name,part_info,object_name,remarks from exa_user_profile_last_day where stmt_id =21 and session_id=current_session; PART_NAME PART_INFO OBJECT_NAME REMARKS COMPILE / EXECUTE (null) (null) (null) SCAN (null) T2 (null) JOIN GLOBAL T1 T2(JOINCOL) => GLOBAL INDEX (JOINCOL) GROUP BY GLOBAL on TEMPORARY table tmp_subselect0 (null)
So that was a global join using a global index. If the two tables were distributed on joincol, this leads to local joins with local indexes. Putting the distribution key on joincol for t1 will automatically convert the existing index into a local index:
alter table t1 distribute by joincol; SUCCESS ALTER 0.90 alter table t2 distribute by joincol; SUCCESS ALTER 0.487 select index_table,remarks from exa_dba_indices where index_table like 'T_'; INDEX_TABLE REMARKS T1 LOCAL INDEX (JOINCOL)
When using prepared statements to do UPDATE or DELETE, this may automatically create an index on the filter column:
update t2 set textcol='Modified' where numcol1=:parameter1; -- Enter 1 SUCCESS UPDATE 0.44 100004 OK select index_table,remarks from exa_dba_indices where index_table like 'T_'; INDEX_TABLE REMARKS T1 LOCAL INDEX (JOINCOL) T2 LOCAL INDEX (NUMCOL1) delete from t1 where numcol2=:parameter2; -- Enter 42 SUCCESS DELETE 0.511 1000 OK select index_table,remarks from exa_dba_indices where index_table like 'T_'; INDEX_TABLE REMARKS T1 LOCAL INDEX (NUMCOL2) T1 LOCAL INDEX (JOINCOL) T2 LOCAL INDEX (NUMCOL1)
This results in local indexes because there is no need to refer to rows on other nodes while each node updates or deletes on his locally stored part of the tables.
I’m using DbVisualizer as a SQL Client for my demos here and it prompts for inputs of :parameter1 and :parameter2 when the statements are executed.
Another reason why indexes are automatically created is when primary or unique constraints are added to a table:
alter table t2 add constraint t2pk primary key (joincol); SUCCESS ALTER 0.39 select index_table,remarks from exa_dba_indices where index_table like 'T_'; INDEX_TABLE REMARKS T1 LOCAL INDEX (NUMCOL2) T1 LOCAL INDEX (JOINCOL) T2 LOCAL INDEX (JOINCOL) T2 LOCAL INDEX (NUMCOL1)
This created a local index because t2 is distributed on joincol.
Please do not take this as a recommendation to add primary or unique constraints to tables in Exasol, I just mentioned it because it also leads to the creation of indexes. MERGE statements also lead to index creation because they are processed as joins, by the way.
Although customers are not required to do anything about indexes, there’s a couple of good practices related with them that make your Exasol database perform even better:
Small numeric formats are optimal for join columns and lead to small efficient indexes. It’s often beneficial to replace multi-column joins respectively joins on large formatted columns by joins on numeric surrogate keys. IDENTITY COLUMNS help to generate these surrogate keys.
Avoid using expressions on the join columns because the resulting indexes are not persisted and have to be built again during every join:
select count(*) from t1 join t2 on t1.joincol+1=t2.joincol+1; -- don't do that
Avoid having mixed data types on join columns because that can also lead to expression indexes:
create or replace table t3 as select to_char(rownum) as joincol, -- don't do that 'Just some text' as textcol, mod(rownum,5) as numcol1, mod(rownum,1000) as numcol2, 5000 as numcol3, to_date ('01.' || lpad(to_char(mod(rownum,12)+1),2,'0') || '.2018' ,'dd.mm.yyyy') as time_id from (select 1 from dual connect by level<=1e6); SUCCESS CREATE 34.925 1000000 OK create or replace table t4 as select * from t1 limit 100; SUCCESS CREATE 0.374 100 OK
Above created a large table t3 using a string type for joincol and a small table t4 using a numeric type for joincol. Upon joining the two, likely t4 becomes the root table and t3 is expression indexed:
select count(*) from t3 join t4 on t3.joincol=t4.joincol; COUNT(*) 100 select index_table,remarks from exa_dba_indices where index_table like 'T_'; INDEX_TABLE REMARKS T1 LOCAL INDEX (NUMCOL2) T1 LOCAL INDEX (JOINCOL) T2 LOCAL INDEX (JOINCOL) T2 LOCAL INDEX (NUMCOL1)
No index listed for t3 as you see. The profile of the join between t3 and t4 shows:
select part_name,part_info,object_name,remarks from exa_user_profile_last_day where stmt_id =95 and session_id=current_session; PART_NAME PART_INFO OBJECT_NAME REMARKS COMPILE / EXECUTE (null) (null) (null) INDEX CREATE EXPRESSION INDEX T3 ExpressionIndex SCAN on REPLICATED table T4 (null) JOIN (null) T3 T4(JOINCOL) => ExpressionIndex GROUP BY GLOBAL on TEMPORARY table tmp_subselect0 (null)
There was an index created for the join, but expression indexes are not persisted. This was a local join (no GLOBAL indicator in the PART_INFO column for the JOIN step) because t4 was replicated across all nodes due to its small size.
Apart from following the mentioned good practices, there’s simply not much for customers to take care of related to indexes in Exasol – it just works 🙂
Exasol creates all indexes it needs automatically.
Tables and Indexes are automatically compressed.
Tables and Indexes are automatically reorganized if required.
Useless indexes are automatically dropped.
The administrative effort related to indexes is close to zero in Exasol.
Investing some time in proper table design initially might still be a good idea.
The technique to recover only certain objects from an ordinary backup is called Virtual Access Restore. Means you create a database from backup that contains only the minimum elements needed to access the objects you request. This database is then removed afterwards.
Let’s see an example. This is my initial setup:
One database in a 2+1 cluster. Yes it’s tiny because it lives on my notebook in VirtualBox. See here how you can get that too.
It uses the data volume v0000 and I took a backup into the archive volume v0002 already.
I have a schema named RETAIL there with the table SALES:
By mistake, that table gets dropped:
And I’m on AUTOCOMMIT, otherwise this could be rolled back in Exasol. Virtual Access Restore to the rescue!
First I need another data volume:
Notice the size of the new volume: It is smaller than the overall size of the backup respectively the size of the “production database”! I did that to prove that space is not much of a concern here.
Then I add a second database to the cluster that uses that volume. The connection port (8564) must be different from the port used by the first database and the DB RAM in total must not exceed the licensed size, which is limited to 4 GB RAM in my case:
I did not start that database because for the restore procedure it has to be down anyway. Clicking on the DB Name and then on the Backups button gets me here:
No backup shown yet because I didn’t take any backups with exa_db2. Clicking on Show foreign database backups:
The Expiration date must be empty for a Virtual Access Restore, so I just remove it and click Apply. Then I select the Restore Type as Virtual Access and click Restore:
This will automatically start the second database:
I connect to exa_db2 with EXAplus, where the Schema Browser gives me the DDL for the table SALES:
I take that to exa_db1 and run it there, which gives me the table back but empty. Next I create a connection from exa_db1 to exa_db2 and import the table
create connection exa_db2 to '192.168.43.11..13:8564' user 'sys' identified by 'exasol'; import into retail.sales from exa at exa_db2 table retail.sales;
This took about 2 Minutes:
The second database and then the second data volume can now be dropped. Problem solved!