Beiträge getaggt mit partitioning
How to move Partitions ONLINE and make them READ ONLY in #Oracle 12c
You’ll see two New Features about Partitions covered here: MOVE ONLINE (12cR1) and READ ONLY (12cR2)
[oracle@uhesse ~]$ sqlplus adam/adam@pdb1 SQL*Plus: Release 12.2.0.1.0 Production on Thu Jan 5 08:53:59 2017 Copyright (c) 1982, 2016, Oracle. All rights reserved. Last Successful login time: Thu Jan 05 2017 08:41:13 +01:00 Connected to: Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition Release 12.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production SQL> select partition_name,compress_for,read_only from user_tab_partitions; PARTITION_ COMPRESS_FOR READ ---------- ------------------------------ ---- Q1 NO Q2 NO Q3 NO Q4 NO SQL> select partition_name,bytes/1024/1024 as mb from user_segments where partition_name like 'Q%'; PARTITION_ MB ---------- ---------- Q1 40 Q2 47 Q3 40 Q4 46
The next command has 12cR1 enhancements: row store compress basic is new syntax for compress basic, having the same effect than the 11g syntax. The online clause is the major improvement here, since it allows that movement while other sessions work with DML statements on that partition:
SQL> alter table sales_range move partition q1 row store compress basic online; Table altered. SQL> select partition_name,compress_for,read_only from user_tab_partitions; PARTITION_ COMPRESS_FOR READ ---------- ------------------------------ ---- Q1 BASIC NO Q2 NO Q3 NO Q4 NO SQL> select partition_name,bytes/1024/1024 as mb from user_segments where partition_name like 'Q%'; PARTITION_ MB ---------- ---------- Q1 16 Q2 47 Q3 40 Q4 46
The following command is a 12cR2 New Feature – Partitions can be made READ ONLY now, preventing DML and DDL statements against them:
SQL> alter table sales_range modify partition q1 read only; Table altered. SQL> select partition_name,compress_for,read_only from user_tab_partitions; PARTITION_ COMPRESS_FOR READ ---------- ------------------------------ ---- Q1 BASIC YES Q2 NO Q3 NO Q4 NO SQL> delete from sales_range where time_id=to_date('01.01.2016','dd.mm.yyyy'); delete from sales_range where time_id=to_date('01.01.2016','dd.mm.yyyy') * ERROR at line 1: ORA-14466: Data in a read-only partition or subpartition cannot be modified. SQL> alter table sales_range drop partition q1; alter table sales_range drop partition q1 * ERROR at line 1: ORA-14466: Data in a read-only partition or subpartition cannot be modified.
To undo the above:
SQL> alter table sales_range modify partition q1 read write; Table altered. SQL> alter table sales_range move partition q1 nocompress online; Table altered. SQL> select partition_name,compress_for,read_only from user_tab_partitions; PARTITION_ COMPRESS_FOR READ ---------- ------------------------------ ---- Q1 NO Q2 NO Q3 NO Q4 NO SQL> select partition_name,bytes/1024/1024 as mb from user_segments where partition_name like 'Q%'; PARTITION_ MB ---------- ---------- Q1 40 Q2 47 Q3 40 Q4 46
Instead of the shown basic compression, OLTP compression and Hybrid Columnar Compression (HCC) can also be done online. Could be a topic of another article to cover that new syntax 🙂
Watch me on YouTube demonstrating the above:
How to reduce Buffer Busy Waits with Hash Partitioned Tables in #Oracle
Large OLTP sites may suffer from Buffer Busy Waits. Hash Partitioning is one way to reduce it on both, Indexes and Tables. My last post demonstrated that for Indexes, now let’s see how it looks like with Tables. Initially there is a normal table that is not yet hash partitioned. If many sessions do insert now simultaneously, the problem shows:

Contention with a heap table
The last extent becomes a hot spot; all inserts go there and only a limited number of blocks is available. Therefore we will see Buffer Busy Waits. The playground:
SQL> create table t (id number, sometext varchar2(50)); Table created. create sequence id_seq; Sequence created. create or replace procedure manyinserts as begin for i in 1..10000 loop insert into t values (id_seq.nextval, 'DOES THIS CAUSE BUFFER BUSY WAITS?'); end loop; commit; end; / Procedure created. create or replace procedure manysessions as v_jobno number:=0; begin FOR i in 1..100 LOOP dbms_job.submit(v_jobno,'manyinserts;', sysdate); END LOOP; commit; end; / Procedure created.
The procedure manysessions is the way how I simulate OLTP end user activity on my demo system. Calling it leads to 100 job sessions. Each does 10.000 inserts:
SQL> exec manysessions PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SQL> select count(*) from t; COUNT(*) ---------- 1000000 SQL> select object_name,subobject_name,value from v$segment_statistics where owner='ADAM' and statistic_name='buffer busy waits' and object_name = 'T'; OBJECT_NAM SUBOBJECT_ VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- T 2985
So we got thousands of Buffer Busy Waits that way. Now the remedy:
SQL> drop table t purge; Table dropped. SQL> create table t (id number, sometext varchar2(50)) partition by hash (id) partitions 32; Table created. SQL> alter procedure manyinserts compile; Procedure altered. SQL> alter procedure manysessions compile; Procedure altered. SQL> exec manysessions PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SQL> select count(*) from t; COUNT(*) ---------- 1000000 SQL> select object_name,subobject_name,value from v$segment_statistics where owner='ADAM' and statistic_name='buffer busy waits' and object_name = 'T'; OBJECT_NAM SUBOBJECT_ VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- T SYS_P249 0 T SYS_P250 1 T SYS_P251 0 T SYS_P252 0 T SYS_P253 0 T SYS_P254 0 T SYS_P255 0 T SYS_P256 1 T SYS_P257 0 T SYS_P258 0 T SYS_P259 1 T SYS_P260 0 T SYS_P261 0 T SYS_P262 0 T SYS_P263 0 T SYS_P264 1 T SYS_P265 1 T SYS_P266 0 T SYS_P267 0 T SYS_P268 0 T SYS_P269 0 T SYS_P270 0 T SYS_P271 1 T SYS_P272 0 T SYS_P273 0 T SYS_P274 0 T SYS_P275 1 T SYS_P276 0 T SYS_P277 0 T SYS_P278 0 T SYS_P279 2 T SYS_P280 0 32 rows selected. SQL> select sum(value) from v$segment_statistics where owner='ADAM' and statistic_name='buffer busy waits' and object_name = 'T'; SUM(VALUE) ---------- 9 SQL> select 2985-9 as waits_gone from dual; WAITS_GONE ---------- 2976
The hot spot is gone:
This emphasizes again that Partitioning is not only for the Data Warehouse. Hash Partitioning in particular can be used to fight contention in OLTP environments.
How to reduce Buffer Busy Waits with Hash Partitioned Indexes in #Oracle
Buffer Busy Waits can be a serious problem for large OLTP systems on both tables and indexes. If e.g. many inserts from multiple sessions occur simultaneously, they may have to compete about the same index leaf blocks like the picture below shows:

Index Leaf Block Contention
For the demo below, I’m using 100 jobs running at the same time to simulate 100 end user session that do inserts into table t with an ordinary index i that is not yet partitioned:
SQL> create table t (id number, sometext varchar2(50)); Table created. SQL> create index i on t(id); Index created. SQL> create sequence id_seq; Sequence created. SQL> create or replace procedure manyinserts as begin for i in 1..10000 loop insert into t values (id_seq.nextval, 'DOES THIS CAUSE BUFFER BUSY WAITS?'); end loop; commit; end; / Procedure created. SQL> create or replace procedure manysessions as v_jobno number:=0; begin for i in 1..100 loop dbms_job.submit(v_jobno,'manyinserts;', sysdate); end loop; commit; end; / Procedure created. SQL> exec manysessions PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
After a couple of minutes the jobs are done and the table is populated:
SQL> select count(*) from t;
COUNT(*)
----------
1000000
SQL> select object_name,subobject_name,value
from v$segment_statistics where owner='ADAM'
and statistic_name='buffer busy waits'
and object_name = 'I';
OBJECT_NAM SUBOBJECT_ VALUE
---------- ---------- ----------
I 167363
There have been Buffer Busy Waits on the table t as well of course, but let’s focus on the index here. Now the same load but with a Hash Partitioned index instead:
SQL> drop index i; Index dropped. SQL> truncate table t; Table truncated. SQL> create index i on t(id) global partition by hash(id) partitions 32; Index created.
Notice that you have to say GLOBAL even though the table is not partitioned itself, so LOCAL is impossible. How about the effect?
SQL> exec manysessions PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SQL> select count(*) from t; COUNT(*) ---------- 1000000 SQL> select object_name,subobject_name,value from v$segment_statistics where owner='ADAM' and statistic_name='buffer busy waits' and object_name = 'I'; OBJECT_NAM SUBOBJECT_ VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- I SYS_P249 138 I SYS_P250 122 I SYS_P251 138 I SYS_P252 120 I SYS_P253 134 I SYS_P254 116 I SYS_P255 132 I SYS_P256 129 I SYS_P257 126 I SYS_P258 140 I SYS_P259 126 I SYS_P260 129 I SYS_P261 142 I SYS_P262 142 I SYS_P263 156 I SYS_P264 155 I SYS_P265 165 I SYS_P266 121 I SYS_P267 142 I SYS_P268 148 I SYS_P269 120 I SYS_P270 112 I SYS_P271 168 I SYS_P272 130 I SYS_P273 129 I SYS_P274 137 I SYS_P275 147 I SYS_P276 131 I SYS_P277 132 I SYS_P278 136 I SYS_P279 124 I SYS_P280 138 32 rows selected.
Instead of having just one hot part, we now have as many ‚warm parts‘ as there are partitions, like the picture below tries to show:

Reduced contention with hash partitioned index
Precisely this was achieved by the solution:
SQL> select sum(value) from v$segment_statistics where owner='ADAM' and statistic_name='buffer busy waits' and object_name = 'I'; SUM(VALUE) ---------- 4325 SQL> select 167363-4325 as waits_gone from dual; WAITS_GONE ---------- 163038
Give me an Oracle Database and I don’t need a calculator 🙂
Watch me explaining the above on YouTube: